IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.
  • UP NEXT

    'He wanted to make money.' The right-wing transformation of Justice Clarence Thomas

    07:07
  • 'Politicians in Robes': How the right-wing Supreme Court is mounting a power grab

    20:10
  • Top Dem 'very much' wants Justices Thomas and Alito to testify before Senate

    11:35
  • At least 5 dead, over 640,000 without power after storms rip through the South

    00:33
  • Mehdi: Christie and Pence were for Trump, before they were against him

    21:23
  • Antiracism author Ibram X. Kendi hits back at Republicans Nikki Haley and Tim Scott

    12:25
  • Mehdi: Twitter’s own lawyers have undermined the Twitter Files

    01:47
  • What the actors behind Stewy and Gerri on “Succession” thought of the finale

    16:47
  • Should we ban Chinese-owned TikTok? An Actual Debate

    17:07
  • Why DeSantis’ threat to “destroy leftism” is so dangerous

    12:33
  • Marianne Williamson's primary campaign against President Biden

    12:12
  • The truth about DeSantis’ awful record on covid

    23:00

What if that 'Succession' election plotline really happened?

12:35

The latest episode of HBO's "Succession" imagines an election night crisis where 100,000 ballots are destroyed in an apparent arson attack, ballots that would effectively decide who becomes the next President of the United States. It's terrifying to think about as 2024 nears, but it's also plausible. How would that scenario play out in real life? Mehdi speaks with Claire Woodall-Vogg, a Wisconsin elections official who consulted on the episode, and UCLA Law Professor Rick Hasen, a renowned election law expert.